Data access within CLR stored procedures is done using the standard ADO.NET classes. Developers will find that...
much of the same data access code usable in application tiers will be easily portable into SQLCLR routines. As these ADO.NET classes in the middle tier require T-SQL for data access, so do the same classes used within the context of the hosted CLR provider.
I noted that it is technically possible to write a T-SQL-less stored procedure. So is there any reason to do so? One case for this is a CLR stored procedure written to retrieve data from a flat file or Web service and format it into a rowset. That would be an operation that would not require T-SQL – but it's not a good comparison with the abilities of T-SQL stored procedures.
Do you have comments on this Ask the Expert Q&A? Let us know.
Dig Deeper on Microsoft SQL Server 2005
Related Q&A from Adam Machanic
Multiple readers can sometimes read the same row simultaneously causing a false result. SQL Server 2005 expert Adam Machanic suggests modifying the ... Continue Reading
Migrating to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000 is a hefty feat when compared to upgrading from 7.0 to SQL Server 2000. Site expert Adam Machanic ... Continue Reading
SQL Server 2005 and T-SQL do have differences. The advantages and disadvantages would depend user environment as described by SQL Server 2005 expert... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.