Could you please tell me, in brief, the differences between SQL-89, SQL-92 and SQL-1999, and whether Oracle and SQL Server fully adhere to SQL-1999?
A full list of the differences between SQL-89, SQL-92, and SQL-99 (a.k.a. SQL1, SQL2, and SQL3) cannot really be summed up in brief –- many changes occurred between each version. However, backwards-compatibility was stressed with each release, and code that worked against SQL-89 should still work with SQL-99.
The most important changes between SQL-89 and SQL-92, in my opinion, were modifications to the join syntax, specifically the addition of the OUTER JOIN clause.
SQL-99 really focused on the business analytics side of things, with additions such as Common Table Expressions and the SQL/PSM standard for defining Java-based modules. SQL/PSM (Persistent Stored Module) was actually added to SQL-92 in 1996, but is considered to be part of the SQL-99 standard.
Both SQL Server and Oracle do support parts of SQL-99 -– but neither of them supports the entire standard.
For more information on the ANSI SQL Standard, I recommend picking up a copy of A Guide to the SQL Standard (4th Edition) by C.J. Date and Hugh Darwen (Addison-Wesley Professional, 1996).
Dig deeper on SQL-Transact SQL (T-SQL)
Related Q&A from Adam Machanic
SQL Server 2005 and T-SQL do have differences. The advantages and disadvantages would depend user environment as described by SQL Server 2005 expert...continue reading
Database Snapshots feature in SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition creates read-only files. For these separate databases, our site expert Adam Machanic...continue reading
Migrating to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000 is a hefty feat when compared to upgrading from 7.0 to SQL Server 2000. Site expert Adam Machanic ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.